Wikipedia talk:WikiProject A Cappella

WikiProject created

Hello world! This WikiProject was created today as the result of a successful proposal for a WikiProject, which you can read here. Looking forward to building out this project's documentation and improving a cappella-related articles with everyone here! —Shrinkydinks (talk) 03:23, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As the Project continues, I will be posting monthly status updates here. If we get enough participants, I can start sending out a newsletter, but for now, I will just be posting here the week of the first day of the month. Good luck to you all, and happy editing! Puddleglum ^2.0 03:34, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Activity

I would honestly like to join it however, if the project isn't active I would rather not since I'd rather not do things alone. So does anyone know if the project is still active? Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 18:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

confused - came here from atypical depression talk page

What does atypical depression have to do with a cappella? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.22.254 (talk) 13:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That connection was added (apparently in error) in July 2021; I've removed it. —ADavidB 13:54, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments are used by Wikipedia editors to rate the quality of articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project decides to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:31, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

English Rebel Songs 1381–1984 listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for English Rebel Songs 1381–1984 to be moved to English Rebel Songs. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:47, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Nasheed listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Nasheed to be moved to Nashid. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 16:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Nomination of Midtown (quartet) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midtown (quartet) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midtown (quartet) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—ADavidB 21:27, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]